Tuesday 16 June 2009
Tuesday 17 March 2009
Not Alone Group Evaluation of Our Final Production
The above is the evaluation that we did as a group, featuring Alex Phillimore (myself), Ellis Greengrass, John Upton and Ian Berry. We watched the film through and commented on specific parts, mentioning how we incorporated anything from camera angles to lighting effects in order to create Our Final Production, and noting some points that you may not have realised whilst watching the film. We talk about how we created a sense of foreboding by incorporating specific shots, and why we made certain choices in the filming, and give an entire overview of the whole film, before reaching a conclusion in the end on what we acheived in making Our Final Production.
Thursday 12 March 2009
Media Conventions within Our Final Production
Media conventions covers everything from Mise-en-Scene within Our Final Production, to how we tackled issues such as gender, appearance, clothing, low-key lighting, and many aspects that essentially made Our Production represent The Thriller Genre. During the video, I discuss how we used particular shots and effects to represent the genre in question, and show how, through use of lighting, camera angles, credits and narrative, we made Our Final Production part of the Thriller genre, and localise it as being this genre above any other.
Media Institutions within Our Final Production
Media Institutions incorporates information on how we would advertise, fund and distribute Our Final Production. The main idea here would be for us to seek financial aid from private distributers and pioneers for British film. We would initially begin with the UK Film Council, and show them our production, and receive feedback based on their suggestion. If we impressed them with what we have accomplished, we would then hopefully be given a grant to provide funding for the production. Based on this grant, we would create our entire film, possibly within a 90 minute maximum, as British films tend to start small when working with new and upcoming film makers. Following this, we would try and get feedback at film councils and conventions for showing British film. Our next destination would be small-scale cinemas, and if enough positive reception and public awareness was received, we'd continue proceeding further until we could show our film to the greatest possible number.
Technology within Our Final Production
Technology within Our Final Production covers how we used varying forms of technology to both film and present our finishing piece. I discuss how we used everything from cameras within the filming process and the iMac computers during editing, to methods of broadcasting such as Blogger or Youtube. I mention every form of technology within Our Final Production, and also how it even helped during the evaluation (hypercam is a life saver!), and from this we show how Media Productions nowadays are far more accessible than they perhaps were in the past. Through the medium of the World Wide Web or broadcasting sites, it is now very simple to get yourself and your message broadcast to a large amount of people, and this is the underlying message within the above video. I also discuss how websites such as www.freesoundproject.org acts as a way to download sound effects, which are incredibly useful in media productions, and then through user-specific programs, such as Audacity of Garage Band, intricate music and soundtracks can be created to accompany a film. Technology ultimately played a large role within Our Final Production, and I go into detail in the above video on how we used these forms of technology to better our production.
Friday 6 March 2009
Target Audience and The Audience Survey
Target Audience was an important area for discussion within Our Final Production. We decided that our final piece would be rated a 15, as it features heavy shots of gore and violence, though doesn't contain any direct attacks. You never see a victim getting stabbed, for example, only the victim after he had been stabbed, and therefore, we believe that a 15 would be a suitable rating for Our Final Production. In terms of who it is aimed at, we would personally say that a teenage demographic would be a viable source for viewing Our Final Production, though as we have created a Psychological Thriller, a more mature audience could find aspects to our production that could entertain them. The idea behind our production is that there are shifting alliances and feelings of betrayel and mistaken identity, so that there's plenty to both confuse and to work out within the overall production for a large audience. That said, we wouldn't target children at all with this piece, and the appeal probably would not be as large for an older audience, for example those in their middle ages and older. Though the storyline would be mature, the film itself still remains a Thriller, and so not everybody would benefit from watching it. The film would probably be more engaging to teenage males than females, due to violence and cursing, and so we would pinpoint the ideal age for watching our film around that of a 16 year old male teenager. That said, others could most certainly enjoy Our Final Production. However, to find out if the demographic we had predicted was reflective of an actual audience, I decided to ask real people who were outsiders to Our Final Production to comment on specific aspects of the piece, to find out which sort of person enjoyed it the most, and who found it to be less appealing.
I created an eight-question survey for people within our media class to fill out, in order to receive feedback based on the scores they gave us. When we all watched the Final Productions together a class, I gave ten questionnaires (five to girls, five to boys), and asked them to comment on Our Final Production, and to rate it in different fields. The following is the survey I created:
Do you think our production represents the Thriller genre well?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5. Our average in this field was 4.7/5
How effective was the music in creating an ominous atmosphere within the production?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5. Our average in this field was 4.5/5
How would you rate the variety of camera angles used within the production?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 3, 5, 5. Our average in this field was 4.3/5
Do you think we used our time effectively within the filming and editing of the piece?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 4. Our average in this field was 4.7/5
How professional did the production look?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 4. Our average in this field was 4.5/5
Did the production have good continuity?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5. Our average in this field was 4.5/5
Was the narrative/storyline easy to follow within the production?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 3, 5, 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3. Our average in this field was 4.1/5
How original would you say the production was?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4. Our average in this field was 4.2/5
Scores were measured as 1 being poor, and 5 being good. Therefore, if people felt that we had incorporatad a good variety of camera shots, they would circle 4 or 5, but if they felt that we did not represent the Thriller genre well, they would circle 1 or 2.
The two highest ratings which we received were on how well Our Final Production represents the Thriller Genre, and how effectively we used our time in filming, which I personally agree with. It is also interesting to note that the area in which we scored the weakest mark based on audience feedback was the area were I personally feel the weakest part of our production was, showing that generally, the audience opinion matched our own. The main things we would change in the future based on the audience feedback is to continue with aspects such as low-key lighting, but also to create a narrative that's easier to follow. Though part of the mystery of the piece was deliberate, we understand that people watching the film may struggle initially to understand exactly what is going on, and from this we would work on creating a tighter, more coherent storyline in our next production.
From the results, we also found that, as we predicted, teenage males within our class seemed to have the biggest interest in Our Final Production. When asking questions about filming and editing, and about particular scenes, it was mainly male members we observed who were asking the questions, and in the audience surveys, the lowest scores were given by females, showing that males would probably enjoy Our Final Production more than a female audience. That said, all results, both male and female, were still positive, and so we must assume that a large audience would still enjoy Our Final Production.
I created an eight-question survey for people within our media class to fill out, in order to receive feedback based on the scores they gave us. When we all watched the Final Productions together a class, I gave ten questionnaires (five to girls, five to boys), and asked them to comment on Our Final Production, and to rate it in different fields. The following is the survey I created:
Do you think our production represents the Thriller genre well?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5. Our average in this field was 4.7/5
How effective was the music in creating an ominous atmosphere within the production?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5. Our average in this field was 4.5/5
How would you rate the variety of camera angles used within the production?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 3, 5, 5. Our average in this field was 4.3/5
Do you think we used our time effectively within the filming and editing of the piece?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 4. Our average in this field was 4.7/5
How professional did the production look?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 4. Our average in this field was 4.5/5
Did the production have good continuity?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5. Our average in this field was 4.5/5
Was the narrative/storyline easy to follow within the production?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 3, 5, 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3. Our average in this field was 4.1/5
How original would you say the production was?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
The marks we received in this field were: 4, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4. Our average in this field was 4.2/5
Scores were measured as 1 being poor, and 5 being good. Therefore, if people felt that we had incorporatad a good variety of camera shots, they would circle 4 or 5, but if they felt that we did not represent the Thriller genre well, they would circle 1 or 2.
The two highest ratings which we received were on how well Our Final Production represents the Thriller Genre, and how effectively we used our time in filming, which I personally agree with. It is also interesting to note that the area in which we scored the weakest mark based on audience feedback was the area were I personally feel the weakest part of our production was, showing that generally, the audience opinion matched our own. The main things we would change in the future based on the audience feedback is to continue with aspects such as low-key lighting, but also to create a narrative that's easier to follow. Though part of the mystery of the piece was deliberate, we understand that people watching the film may struggle initially to understand exactly what is going on, and from this we would work on creating a tighter, more coherent storyline in our next production.
From the results, we also found that, as we predicted, teenage males within our class seemed to have the biggest interest in Our Final Production. When asking questions about filming and editing, and about particular scenes, it was mainly male members we observed who were asking the questions, and in the audience surveys, the lowest scores were given by females, showing that males would probably enjoy Our Final Production more than a female audience. That said, all results, both male and female, were still positive, and so we must assume that a large audience would still enjoy Our Final Production.
Thursday 5 March 2009
Comparing Our Final Production to Our Preliminary Task
The above is the video where I talk about Our Final Production, and compare it to the Preliminary Task, in order to see where we have advanced and how we have incorporated conventions of our last production within our final one. I mention how we have used camera angles (particularly the over-the-shoulder shot) within Our Final Production based on how well they worked within Our Preliminary Task, and altogether we owe many of the production values in Our Final Production from our Preliminary. I believe that we took feedback and problems that we initially had with the Preliminary task, for example recorded speech, and found a way to tackle them and improve on our earlier work in order to create the best possible Final Production.
The main example of this is the speech, which in the Preliminary Task was recorded alongside the shots. This lead to interference and sounds that we did not wish to have within the production, and based on this we decided to dub the sound in the Final Production, to create the best possible effect that we could. Several other comparisons are also made within Our Final Production, such as varying camera angles (low angle, long shot), but these shall all be discussed within the above video.
Tuesday 3 March 2009
Our Final Production Evaluation
The Evaluation of Our Final Production. The video features me speaking over the video, pausing at specific points in order to discuss how I felt the clips and such worked, and what I was pleased with and how I feel we could improve on particular parts. The video covers the entire film and critically evaluates the most important shots, whilst giving a narrative on how we used our time, how everything planned out, and what we ultimately acheived.
Friday 27 February 2009
~Our Final Production~
Our Final Production, without evaluation or narrative. This video is simply Our Final Production itself, encompassing 1:44 of footage.
Tuesday 10 February 2009
Editing within Our Final Production
Editing was by far the most demanding part of our Final Production, yet we were also suprised with how efficiently it ensued. We had a minor setback in that the first days editing was lost, due to data corruption, but after that, the editing went smoothly, and it was not long before we saw the fruits of our labour becoming what we had initally envisioned. We spent several days lessons time, in addition to several days after school getting the film in the correct order, and the first task was to make sure that, out of the nine minutes of footage we initially had, we could pinpoint the two minutes worth of clips which we needed to meet the brief.
We had such an enormous amount of footage due to numerous shots of each scene, so that we could decide which worked best together and use them. However, editing it down did not take as long as we thought, and I'd estimate that it took about an hour to get all of the clips in order. The first day of editing was mainly focused on deciding which clips to keep and which to discard, and afterwards we believe we selected the best shots that we could have chosen.
The next task was to cut the clips down; we still had four minutes of footage within our clips, and it was quite a difficult task to cut them down, and decide which bits were needed and which were not. We hadn't predicted how short of a period of time two minutes was during filming, and meeting the brief proved to be quite a task in itself. However, we eventually managed to reduce our film to just under two minutes (1:51), and this allowed us to add the titles and credits, and to change any scenes which we needed to at the time.
The last task was to add sound to the production, which me and John handled ourselves after school. The main soundtrack was the one featured on the previous page of my blog, which I made using www.freesoundproject.com, and the additional sound effects came from the Mac computers as copyright-free material - mainly the thuds and suspense-driven music which overlays the title track. After the sound was added, it was the simple task to look over everything and to see which parts needed changing and any extra effects which we needed to add, before Our Final Production would be completed.
We had such an enormous amount of footage due to numerous shots of each scene, so that we could decide which worked best together and use them. However, editing it down did not take as long as we thought, and I'd estimate that it took about an hour to get all of the clips in order. The first day of editing was mainly focused on deciding which clips to keep and which to discard, and afterwards we believe we selected the best shots that we could have chosen.
The next task was to cut the clips down; we still had four minutes of footage within our clips, and it was quite a difficult task to cut them down, and decide which bits were needed and which were not. We hadn't predicted how short of a period of time two minutes was during filming, and meeting the brief proved to be quite a task in itself. However, we eventually managed to reduce our film to just under two minutes (1:51), and this allowed us to add the titles and credits, and to change any scenes which we needed to at the time.
The last task was to add sound to the production, which me and John handled ourselves after school. The main soundtrack was the one featured on the previous page of my blog, which I made using www.freesoundproject.com, and the additional sound effects came from the Mac computers as copyright-free material - mainly the thuds and suspense-driven music which overlays the title track. After the sound was added, it was the simple task to look over everything and to see which parts needed changing and any extra effects which we needed to add, before Our Final Production would be completed.
Monday 9 February 2009
Concept Art for Our Final Production
My friend Ingrid drew this picture upon the specification I gave her about the staircase and the kitchen, and she created a suprisingly life-like and close-to-the-real-thing picture which I personally love. I'm really grateful to her for helping, and the picture really is a nice, gritty, Film Noir-esque take on our production, with Ian's legs still visible upon the stairway, as seen in one of our shots. She signed her name in the corner alongside her acknowledgement of the project, and I hope that others can enjoy her art in the same way.
Filming - The Third Day
On the Third Day of filming, the idea was to not only finish our Final Production in terms of footage before editing, but also to clear up and re-shoot any scenes which we felt needed perfecting. Therefore, this time around, as we had Ian, we initially decided to finish the final scene in the shower, which acts as the climax to our sinister production. We managed to bring together several important aspects of the filming during this final day, which we're glad of how they came out. At first, Ian had to lie back in the shower, as if he had been murdered. We then had to make convincing blood, and for this we used tomato sauce (yes, that old chestnut) watered down, in order to get the consistency right. Though red food dye may have worked better for the job, we felt that it would be a risk to get it near clothes, as it would most certainly dye the material of Ian's shirt and jeans if he was to come into contact with the mixture. The final appearance of the blood is not without fault, but it serves the purpose well, and we're glad of how it came out for the brief period of time where it was in shot.
During this scene, we also added the clip, which we hadn't originally planned, where John is assaulted as he investigates the body. There are clips throughout the production hinting at the murderer still being within the building, though initially we had only planned on the murderer's hand coming into contact with the bloody palm on the glass of the shower, rather than a full frontal attack. However, during filming we came to the conclusion that a more dramatic effect would be had if John was assaulted just as he watches Ian's body, which we found worked rather well in the context of the production. The lights go out and John has a towel thrown over his head, which flows into the credits and a blur of white noise, which finishes off the climactic scene well.
That same day, we also finished off and repeated several scenes that we had filmed the previous days which we weren't completely happy with, and we took advantage of the time at our disposal to add some neat affects. One was the scene with me and Ellis outside - which we later dubbed with speech - acting as the detectives investigating the murder of our colleague, which ends nicely with a sweeping cut of the curtain falling in front of the camera. Another shot which we added at this point was the complex shot with Ellis in the mirror, moving away when John walked in front of his silhouette, and though this shot took a long time to get right, we're glad with how it ultimately came out. In all, we were proud of our progress across the three days, and the fact that we stuck to the brief we had made ourselves (to have finished filming in three days), and the only task left to do was to begin the editing - a challenge that we found would be more complex, yet far more rewarding than we had thought.
During this scene, we also added the clip, which we hadn't originally planned, where John is assaulted as he investigates the body. There are clips throughout the production hinting at the murderer still being within the building, though initially we had only planned on the murderer's hand coming into contact with the bloody palm on the glass of the shower, rather than a full frontal attack. However, during filming we came to the conclusion that a more dramatic effect would be had if John was assaulted just as he watches Ian's body, which we found worked rather well in the context of the production. The lights go out and John has a towel thrown over his head, which flows into the credits and a blur of white noise, which finishes off the climactic scene well.
That same day, we also finished off and repeated several scenes that we had filmed the previous days which we weren't completely happy with, and we took advantage of the time at our disposal to add some neat affects. One was the scene with me and Ellis outside - which we later dubbed with speech - acting as the detectives investigating the murder of our colleague, which ends nicely with a sweeping cut of the curtain falling in front of the camera. Another shot which we added at this point was the complex shot with Ellis in the mirror, moving away when John walked in front of his silhouette, and though this shot took a long time to get right, we're glad with how it ultimately came out. In all, we were proud of our progress across the three days, and the fact that we stuck to the brief we had made ourselves (to have finished filming in three days), and the only task left to do was to begin the editing - a challenge that we found would be more complex, yet far more rewarding than we had thought.
Sunday 8 February 2009
Filming - The Second Day
The Second Day of filming was the least productive of both, as we didn't have Ian with us, due to events which led him unable to attend. Therefore, we were missing the victim of our piece (which is a problem when you're filming a murder-based thriller). Therefore, we had to work without him, and we decided collectively that on the Second Day, we would film everything that we could that didn't involve Ian. As Ian was only really used as an actor during the final, closing scene of the production, whilst lying dead within the shower, we found that we could film quite a fair bit of the action without him being there. We decided to tackle the scenes upstairs that didn't have Ian in them, and we agreed that on the Third Day, we'd finish off any bits that we needed to do.
The first major scene here was when John was coming up the stairs with a torch. This shot took a long time to get right, as the room was very dark and it was difficult to make John out amongst the dark resolution. However, the way in which the torch in the shot we decided upon flickers across the camera was an impressive (and intentional) use of the tools at our disposal. The effect gives a blur to the shot near the end, which then crossfades into a shot of the camera poised towards the mirror, reflecting John walking into the room, which was one of the three shots I mentioned earlier which I was happiest with; John isn't just filmed entering the room - the mirror reflects his entrance, giving an eerie and dramatic effect. The next shot which we did on the second day was also one of the most difficult (but rewarding) shots out of all of the ones we did. Whereas the knife rack shot on the First Day took a long time because of us wanting to be perfectionists, the following shot took an incredibly long time to get right due to it's complexity.
The main objective here was to have John walk in front of the mirror in the master bedroom, his torch shining in all directions as he looked for clues. Then, as he walked in the way of the camera, we would see a dark figure in the background, his head held low to increase tension and hide his face. As John walked back the other way, the figure disappeared as he moved in the way of the camera. Ellis was the figure, and this shot took a long time to perfect, as we had to time it just right. Quite often, Ellis would move out of the way too soon, or John would be too early in his delivery, and thus it took time to make the shots match up. In the end, we decided it was easier to take different parts of our 10+ shots and to join different bits of them together, rather than filming the entire scene perfectly (as it was really difficult to do, and we were on a time limit). The overall delivery we feel went well, and the shot(s) was one of the best within the production, in my opinion. This was the second of my three favourite shots, and I'm really happy with how it came out.
Overall, on the Second Day, we completed any filming that we did not need Ian for, so that on the final day, we could finish off filming and begin editing. The last shot we filmed this day was me and Ellis walking towards the building, so that our Final Production had some voice-work within it, as well as to add the scene at the end with the speech, to avoid the production seeming like a trailer. We are pleased with how the scene came out, and the way the curtain pulls across at the end was a pleasing finish to our piece.
The first major scene here was when John was coming up the stairs with a torch. This shot took a long time to get right, as the room was very dark and it was difficult to make John out amongst the dark resolution. However, the way in which the torch in the shot we decided upon flickers across the camera was an impressive (and intentional) use of the tools at our disposal. The effect gives a blur to the shot near the end, which then crossfades into a shot of the camera poised towards the mirror, reflecting John walking into the room, which was one of the three shots I mentioned earlier which I was happiest with; John isn't just filmed entering the room - the mirror reflects his entrance, giving an eerie and dramatic effect. The next shot which we did on the second day was also one of the most difficult (but rewarding) shots out of all of the ones we did. Whereas the knife rack shot on the First Day took a long time because of us wanting to be perfectionists, the following shot took an incredibly long time to get right due to it's complexity.
The main objective here was to have John walk in front of the mirror in the master bedroom, his torch shining in all directions as he looked for clues. Then, as he walked in the way of the camera, we would see a dark figure in the background, his head held low to increase tension and hide his face. As John walked back the other way, the figure disappeared as he moved in the way of the camera. Ellis was the figure, and this shot took a long time to perfect, as we had to time it just right. Quite often, Ellis would move out of the way too soon, or John would be too early in his delivery, and thus it took time to make the shots match up. In the end, we decided it was easier to take different parts of our 10+ shots and to join different bits of them together, rather than filming the entire scene perfectly (as it was really difficult to do, and we were on a time limit). The overall delivery we feel went well, and the shot(s) was one of the best within the production, in my opinion. This was the second of my three favourite shots, and I'm really happy with how it came out.
Overall, on the Second Day, we completed any filming that we did not need Ian for, so that on the final day, we could finish off filming and begin editing. The last shot we filmed this day was me and Ellis walking towards the building, so that our Final Production had some voice-work within it, as well as to add the scene at the end with the speech, to avoid the production seeming like a trailer. We are pleased with how the scene came out, and the way the curtain pulls across at the end was a pleasing finish to our piece.
Filming - The First Day
Upon the first day of filming, we had the basic plan in mind for what we were going to achieve across the three-day period. We had planned it so that the filming itself would take several hours to complete, as we would be repeating each and every shot a minimum of three times in order for us to have a wider variety during production to choose from, and to highlight the best clips from the array. This worked well, and on the first day we planned to do all of the scenes downstairs within the house. We worked chronolocially, as we felt it would be the best course of action, and that starting from any point other than the beginning would confuse us at a later stage. We filmed John entering the house, through the doorway, with the medium shot watching him cautiously observing the scene of the murder.
John was dressed in his coat, which was the nearest piece of equipment we could find to make him look like a detective. We were thinking originally to give him a pipe and a deerstalker hat, though that decision was scrapped as it was deemed 'too historic', and we didn't want John looking like a Sherlock Holmes impersonator. Therefore, we kept the clothing of John fairly simple; he looks like a protagonist, and it's quite obvious that his role is to investigate the murder at the estate. The medium shot turned to a low-angle shot looking up at John as he watches the surroundings, first glancing at the staircase, and then to the kitchen. We followed John through a side window in one of the rooms attached to the hallway, so that John is seen walking by (an effect that we are quite proud of, and it's conveniant that the window was there). We did, in retrospect, try to include a wide variety of shots within our Final Production, and I can personally think of three right now which were a brainwave we had, though I'll mention them at the key points where we filmed them. John is then shown walking into the kitchen, with an over-the-shoulder shot tracking his viewpoint. We later on added a clip where John is seen observing the table in the kitchen through the bannister of the staircase, though we filmed that on the third day as an addition. For now, John turned around a wall and noticed a knife rack ahead.
The knife rack scene was infamous within our filming, as it certainly took longer than any other shot to perfect. The ultimate aim was to make the scene from nightvision to standard, and vice-versa, occur without any difference in clip. Therefore, when we lifted the camera to track John's view as he closed in on the knife rack (point of view shot), we had to hold the camera directly still in midair, without a flicker of movement, in order to switch to the night vision shot, where we could see back in time to what happened, and to explain why the knife was missing. This shot took forever to do - I think the overall total was thirty-something minutes just filming the exact same scene over and over again, to make the scene change from standard to night-vision look flawless without any movement. Eventually we managed to hit the nail on the head and acquire the shot which we wanted, and we also managed to get a pretty impressive shot of the knife shimmering in the sunlight (even though we changed to resolution of the camera to make it appear dark), which works well and shows the villains evil intent.
During the first day, we also shot the clips of Ian on the floor, writhing in pain and struggling. Though in the Final Production, these shots were cut down drastically (a couple of seconds, if that), we actually filmed him struggling for minutes, so that we could get the best possibly shot. We're glad with how it came out, and though we'd have liked to have kept some of the other aspects of this scene within, we're glad with how quick shots work well in relation to the bursts of sound which accompany them within The Final Production.
The First Day was a success in our opinion, and we filmed much of the content of the latter two days.
John was dressed in his coat, which was the nearest piece of equipment we could find to make him look like a detective. We were thinking originally to give him a pipe and a deerstalker hat, though that decision was scrapped as it was deemed 'too historic', and we didn't want John looking like a Sherlock Holmes impersonator. Therefore, we kept the clothing of John fairly simple; he looks like a protagonist, and it's quite obvious that his role is to investigate the murder at the estate. The medium shot turned to a low-angle shot looking up at John as he watches the surroundings, first glancing at the staircase, and then to the kitchen. We followed John through a side window in one of the rooms attached to the hallway, so that John is seen walking by (an effect that we are quite proud of, and it's conveniant that the window was there). We did, in retrospect, try to include a wide variety of shots within our Final Production, and I can personally think of three right now which were a brainwave we had, though I'll mention them at the key points where we filmed them. John is then shown walking into the kitchen, with an over-the-shoulder shot tracking his viewpoint. We later on added a clip where John is seen observing the table in the kitchen through the bannister of the staircase, though we filmed that on the third day as an addition. For now, John turned around a wall and noticed a knife rack ahead.
The knife rack scene was infamous within our filming, as it certainly took longer than any other shot to perfect. The ultimate aim was to make the scene from nightvision to standard, and vice-versa, occur without any difference in clip. Therefore, when we lifted the camera to track John's view as he closed in on the knife rack (point of view shot), we had to hold the camera directly still in midair, without a flicker of movement, in order to switch to the night vision shot, where we could see back in time to what happened, and to explain why the knife was missing. This shot took forever to do - I think the overall total was thirty-something minutes just filming the exact same scene over and over again, to make the scene change from standard to night-vision look flawless without any movement. Eventually we managed to hit the nail on the head and acquire the shot which we wanted, and we also managed to get a pretty impressive shot of the knife shimmering in the sunlight (even though we changed to resolution of the camera to make it appear dark), which works well and shows the villains evil intent.
During the first day, we also shot the clips of Ian on the floor, writhing in pain and struggling. Though in the Final Production, these shots were cut down drastically (a couple of seconds, if that), we actually filmed him struggling for minutes, so that we could get the best possibly shot. We're glad with how it came out, and though we'd have liked to have kept some of the other aspects of this scene within, we're glad with how quick shots work well in relation to the bursts of sound which accompany them within The Final Production.
The First Day was a success in our opinion, and we filmed much of the content of the latter two days.
The Blog and Our Final Production [Part 2]
The second part of my blog will be more focused than the first - where the first half covered everything from Film Noir to planning, and all of the productions which were filmed in between, the second part of my blog will be solely presented as a way to document what events occur during editing of our final production, how the filming went, and large-scale evaluations of every scene. It's a large task, but one that I'm looking forward to being a part of, and over the next few weeks, great advances will be made on the blog. The ultimate goal is to eventually have our Final Production hosted here, for public as well as private access, with detailed analysis of the key points, bits that we would like to have improved upon, and parts that we were especially content with.
At the time of writing, we are in the early stages of production. The filming has been completed (taking three days), and the editing of clips is halfway to completion (clips are in order but not cut in length). All we have left to do is add the soundtrack, any sound clips that we may need upon the way to create suspense, as well as dub the speech at the end, and then we will be realistically finished, and ready to complete the analysis. Right now, it's difficult to comment on exactly what will happen in later stages of post-production, but I am so far impressed with how the production has come out, and I just hope that all those viewing enjoy reading and viewing information about Our Final Production. Expect the video to be up within the week, as well as an out-takes and bloopers easter egg. I will be adding a lot of content over the coming days/weeks, and I look forward to seeing where the Blog takes us!
Alex's Blog: Part 2
At the time of writing, we are in the early stages of production. The filming has been completed (taking three days), and the editing of clips is halfway to completion (clips are in order but not cut in length). All we have left to do is add the soundtrack, any sound clips that we may need upon the way to create suspense, as well as dub the speech at the end, and then we will be realistically finished, and ready to complete the analysis. Right now, it's difficult to comment on exactly what will happen in later stages of post-production, but I am so far impressed with how the production has come out, and I just hope that all those viewing enjoy reading and viewing information about Our Final Production. Expect the video to be up within the week, as well as an out-takes and bloopers easter egg. I will be adding a lot of content over the coming days/weeks, and I look forward to seeing where the Blog takes us!
Alex's Blog: Part 2
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
